Go look at MSDN for the native API, that is what documentation should look like, as a minimum. If they copied/pasted the whole VCL source code into the h-files, that would still just be source code, not source code -documentation. A declaration doesn't count as documentation, nor does any source code comments. The quality of the whole product has gone completely downhill since BCB5, which had proper documentation, a working debugger and no IDE bugs worth mentioning.ĭeclarations?! Have you never actually worked with code that had proper source code documentation? Then you'd know what it looks like. The main reasons are that the documentation is worthless, the debugger is worthless and the IDE is buggy. And that's why I'm using CreateThread, I want to port as much as the code as possible to VS. I just have to program this Windows interface for an embedded device, and once that project is done I am indeed going to stop using the VCL AND Builder. I had good experience of Borland in the past (BCB5), that's why I bought Builder 2009. If I need to learn Delphi to use Builder, then why is there a product called C++ Builder? I'm a C++ programmer comming from an entirely different sphere than you Windows programmers, namely embedded programming.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |